Connecticut Senate Bill SB00918

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/23/17
• Refer: 2/23/17
• Report Pass: 3/2/17
• Refer: 3/15/17
• Report Pass: 3/21/17
• Engrossed: 5/30/17
• Report Pass: 5/31/17
• Chaptered: 6/9/17
• Enrolled: 6/16/17
• Passed: 6/27/17

Caption

An Act Concerning A Municipal Option Property Tax Exemption For Gold Star Parents And Spouses.

Impact

If enacted, the bill would allow municipalities to implement property tax exemptions that could alleviate the financial burden on these families. The exemption amount could be up to $20,000 or 10% of the assessed property value, thereby providing substantial relief. This reflects a recognition of the sacrifice made by military families and aims to honor their loss in a meaningful way. The bill, effective from October 1, 2017, ensures that local governments have the discretion to offer this benefit, thereby creating a new avenue for municipal support of Gold Star families.

Summary

Senate Bill 918, also known as the Municipal Option Property Tax Exemption for Gold Star Parents and Spouses, proposes a property tax exemption for parents and spouses of individuals who were killed in action while serving in the armed forces. Municipalities can opt to provide this exemption upon approval by their legislative body, aimed at offering financial relief to families who have lost loved ones in military service. Eligible beneficiaries must meet certain income criteria, ensuring that those who receive the exemption are within a specified income threshold.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 918 appears to be quite positive, particularly among legislators and advocacy groups that support military families. The heartwarming nature of the bill resonates with many, as it addresses a sensitive issue involving the sacrifices made by service members and their families. Most discussions point toward the importance of recognizing these sacrifices through tangible support systems such as this tax exemption. However, there may be concerns about the implementation and administration of such exemptions by municipalities, although these are not heavily contested.

Contention

One notable point of contention arises from the income eligibility requirements for the exemption. While the intention is to support deserving families, discussions may have included questions about how municipalities will verify eligibility and manage the application process. Some opposition may center on the complexities involved in applying for the exemption and whether additional bureaucratic burdens could deter families from claiming what they are entitled to. Overall, the bill is largely seen as a supportive measure with minor logistical challenges.