Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07323

Introduced
5/25/17  
Engrossed
5/25/17  
Enrolled
5/30/17  
Enrolled
5/30/17  
Passed
6/1/17  
Passed
6/1/17  
Chaptered
6/6/17  
Chaptered
6/6/17  
Enrolled
6/7/17  

Caption

An Act Making Deficiency Appropriations For The Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2017.

Impact

The passage of HB 7323 has significant implications for state law, especially relating to fiscal responsibility and the management of public funds. By making these deficiency appropriations, the bill reinforces the state's commitment to maintaining essential services even amidst financial constraints. It seeks to stabilize state operations for the remaining fiscal year, thereby ensuring that critical functions of state government do not face disruptions due to inadequate funding.

Summary

House Bill 7323, officially known as an Act Making Deficiency Appropriations for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2017, focuses on allocating necessary funds to key state departments to cover budget shortfalls. This bill emphasizes the need to ensure that vital services, particularly those related to public safety, health, and early childhood education, are adequately funded. The total amount appropriated under this bill is approximately $19.5 million, distributed across various departments, including Emergency Services, Developmental Services, and Public Defender Services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 7323 appears to be largely positive, particularly among those who prioritize the importance of sustaining critical public services. Bipartisan support is often seen for bills that focus on fiscal integrity and the provision of necessary services. However, there may be caution among some legislators regarding the need for careful fiscal management to avoid future budget deficits. The overall mood reflects a consensus on the importance of responsive governance in times of financial strain.

Contention

Potential points of contention regarding HB 7323 could arise from the allocation of funds and the prioritization of certain departments over others. For instance, while many lawmakers may agree on the need for public safety and health funding, debates could emerge around the effectiveness and distribution of funds among various sectors. Additionally, this bill underscores an ongoing conversation about how best to address funding deficiencies without impacting state services negatively or leading to future budget shortfalls.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.