Louisiana House Bill HCR123

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/13/16
• Engrossed: 5/16/16
• Refer: 5/17/16
• Report Pass: 5/31/16
• Passed: 6/5/16

Caption

Requests that the Board of Regents study the compensation of public postsecondary education system presidents and other system officers and board members

Impact

The resolution does not enact new laws but rather calls for a structured analysis that could inform future legislative decisions regarding compensation in the education sector. It highlights the importance of ensuring that public resources are utilized effectively while also maintaining the long-term sustainability of the state's public postsecondary education system. The outcome of this study could potentially influence policy changes aimed at modifying compensation structures within educational institutions.

Summary

HCR123 is a House Concurrent Resolution that urges the Board of Regents to undertake a comprehensive study of the compensation of public postsecondary education system presidents, officers, and board members in Louisiana. The resolution emphasizes the need for a thorough review of state operations and spending, particularly in public education, to identify areas where reforms can lead to enhanced accountability, efficiency, and effectiveness. The study is expected to include an examination of not just base salaries but also additional benefits such as allowances for housing and transportation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR123 is generally positive among legislators who recognize the necessity for fiscal responsibility in state spending. The resolution received broad support in the Senate, passing with a vote of 33 yeas to 1 nay, indicating a strong consensus on the importance of examining and justifying executive compensation in public education. However, there may be contention regarding the specifics of the proposed compensation packages and the implications of the study for public perception and operational practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between competitive compensation to attract qualified leadership in public education and the ethical responsibilities of using taxpayer funds. Critics of high executive salaries in education often argue that such compensation should reflect public service ethics and the necessity for judicious fiscal management. The study mandated by HCR123 seeks to address these concerns by comparing local compensation standards to peer systems, which may lead to discussions on fairness, transparency, and accountability in the use of public funds.