Louisiana House Bill HCSR5

Louisiana 2011 Regular Session

Caption

Requests the House and Senate education committees to study and make recommendations relative to compensation of top level administrators of public colleges and universities, public postsecondary education management systems, and the Board of Regents

Impact

The bill seeks to not only identify high-level administrators but also to undertake a comprehensive analysis of their compensation packages, including salaries, allowances, benefits, and retirement plans. The aim is to gather relevant data to facilitate a comparison of compensation levels both within institutional systems as well as in relation to similar positions in other states and sectors. This could have significant implications for how state laws governing higher educational institutions approach salary structures and public spending on personnel.

Summary

HCSR5 is a resolution that calls for the Louisiana House and Senate education committees to convene as a joint committee for the purpose of studying and making recommendations regarding the compensation of high-level administrators at public colleges and universities, as well as related management systems and the Board of Regents. With the current financial constraints facing the state, this bill seeks to examine the appropriateness of present compensation structures in a context where many are scrutinizing budget expenditures.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding HCSR5 is one of cautious evaluation. Supporters view the request for a comprehensive study as a necessary step towards ensuring fiscal responsibility and equity in the compensation of top educational leaders. However, concerns have been raised about the potential for salary cuts, especially in a competitive academic environment where institutions must attract and retain qualified candidates, which could lead to opposition around the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance of cost containment versus the need for competitive compensation to attract top talent in education administration. Critics may argue that focusing on cost reduction without understanding the complexities involved in salary structures could lead to adverse effects on the quality of leadership in higher education. Additionally, there is an inherent debate over the appropriateness of executive compensation in light of public perception and financial constraints.