Connecticut House Bill HJ00028

Connecticut 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/18
• Refer: 3/5/18
• Report Pass: 3/23/18
• Refer: 4/3/18
• Report Pass: 4/10/18
• Report Pass: 4/23/18

Caption

Resolution Proposing A State Constitutional Amendment To Permit Early Voting.

Impact

The proposed amendments would significantly alter the state's election framework by introducing provisions for early voting. Supporters of HJ00028 argue that allowing early voting would facilitate higher voter turnout and provide greater opportunities for participation, particularly benefiting those facing obstacles in attending polls on election day. The passage of this amendment could lead to the establishment of a more inclusive voting environment, especially for individuals with disabilities or those who must travel long distances to polling places.

Summary

HJ00028 is a resolution proposing a state constitutional amendment that seeks to permit early voting in the state. The resolution specifically calls for amendments to key sections of the state constitution to enable the general assembly to establish laws permitting in-person voting for a minimum of eight hours over a span of two to five days prior to election day. This proposal aims to increase voter access and make participation in elections more convenient for those unable to vote on the scheduled election day due to various legitimate reasons, including sickness or religious obligations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJ00028 appeared to be mixed, with proponents hailing it as a progressive step towards enhancing democratic participation, while detractors raised concerns regarding the feasibility and security of implementing early voting. Advocates included members of the legislature who see the amendment as a necessary modernizing measure for the state's electoral process. On the other hand, skepticism lingered among some legislators who questioned the potential administrative challenges and costs associated with early voting.

Contention

Discussion around HJ00028 highlighted notable points of contention primarily centered on the specifics of implementation and the potential impact on election integrity. Critics worried that expanding voting times could lead to complications in monitoring the electoral process, while some legislators expressed concerns about the balance between voter access and the necessity for secure and fair elections. The resolution also raised questions about how early voting would be managed logistically and whether it might create disparities in voter experience across different municipalities.