Louisiana Senate Bill SB130

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/17
• Refer: 3/30/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Constitutional amendment to phase out the ad valorem tax on inventory and to reduce the industrial property tax exemption on millages related to school funding. (2/3 - CA13sl(A)) (OR DECREASE LF RV See Note)

Impact

If enacted, the bill would significantly alter state laws related to ad valorem taxation and local school funding. The progressive phase-out of inventory taxes is intended to incentivize businesses by reducing operating costs; however, local public school boards may face funding challenges due to diminished tax revenues. With a gradual increase in tax exemptions over the next decade, manufacturers might benefit from lower financial obligations, potentially boosting economic activity in the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 130 proposes a constitutional amendment aimed at phasing out ad valorem taxes on inventory over a ten-year period, ultimately providing a complete exemption by January 1, 2028. Additionally, the bill seeks to amend existing laws concerning industrial property tax exemptions, specifically addressing taxes imposed by local school boards. The proposed amendment retains the State Board of Commerce and Industry's authority to grant tax exemptions for new or expanding manufacturing facilities but restricts full exemptions on local school-related taxes after ten years of usage of the properties involved.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 130 is mixed. Proponents, particularly those in the business community, regard the bill as a positive step toward enhancing the competitive environment for Louisiana manufacturers. They argue that eliminating inventory taxes would facilitate business growth and investment. Conversely, critics express concern about the potential adverse effects on education funding, fearing that reducing the tax base will jeopardize financial resources necessary for public schools, which may affect educational outcomes and community stability.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balancing act between fostering a beneficial business climate and protecting essential funding for public education. Advocates for funding education caution against prioritizing tax benefits for manufacturers at the expense of school resources. The debate reflects broader concerns about economic strategies that favor certain sectors while risking the stability and support of public services—a challenge that legislators will need to navigate as they consider the long-term implications of the bill.