Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB260

Introduced
2/28/18  
Introduced
2/28/18  
Refer
2/28/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
3/28/18  
Engrossed
4/4/18  
Engrossed
4/4/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Enrolled
5/2/18  
Chaptered
5/11/18  
Chaptered
5/11/18  
Passed
5/11/18  

Caption

Provides relative to DNA collection for certain offenses

Impact

With the implementation of HB 260, state laws will see changes in the procedures followed by law enforcement agencies regarding DNA collections from offenders. The bill establishes clearer guidelines on which offenses necessitate DNA sampling, ultimately contributing to a more comprehensive database that law enforcement can utilize in solving crimes. This could likely lead to more effective monitoring of offenders and may help deter potential criminal behavior among those aware of the stringent DNA requirements following specific convictions.

Summary

House Bill 260 addresses the issue of DNA collection from certain offenders, specifically targeting sexual and violent crimes. The bill aims to enhance the existing laws regarding DNA detection and collection by explicitly defining additional offenses that require DNA samples to be collected. This legislation enriches the criminal justice framework by ensuring that individuals convicted of specific crimes are compelled to provide DNA samples, which can be instrumental in addressing repeat offenses and bolstering public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be largely positive, with a consensus on the benefits of improving public safety through enhanced DNA collection methods. Supporters argue that the legislation is a crucial step in utilizing modern technology to combat crime effectively, especially concerning sexual and violent offenses. However, there may be concerns related to privacy and civil liberties among certain civil rights advocates who worry about the implications of extensive DNA collection and its potential misuse.

Contention

While the overall reaction to HB 260 is supportive, the key points of contention include the balance between public safety and individual rights. Critics may argue that mandatory DNA collection could lead to overreach by the state, particularly if individuals are subjected to sampling for non-violent offenses. This raises questions about the ethical and legal ramifications of broadening the scope of DNA collection, emphasizing the need for careful considerations and safeguarding protocols to protect personal rights within the criminal justice system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SB544

Adds offenses to list of crimes requiring DNA collection for inclusion in the state DNA database. (8/15/10)

LA SB220

Provides relative to penalties for certain offenses. (8/1/17)

LA SB35

Provides relative to certain sex offenses. (8/1/15)

LA HB5

Provides relative to penalties for certain sex offenses (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB494

Provides for the classification of criminal offenses and criminal penalties based on the class of the offense

LA SB117

Provides relative to certain sex offenses. (8/1/15)

LA SB204

Removes provisions which allow an employer to waive the existence of certain criminal offenses when hiring any licensed ambulance personnel or nonlicensed persons. (8/15/10)

LA HB163

Provides relative to victims of certain sex-related crimes (EN INCREASE SD RV See Note)

LA SB757

Prostitution: sex offender registration and DNA collection.

LA SB780

Provides relative to penalties for certain second felony sex offenses and for registration and certain employment prohibitions for sex offenders. (gov sig)

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.