Connecticut House Bill HB07198

Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/19
• Refer: 2/21/19
• Report Pass: 3/22/19
• Refer: 4/3/19
• Report Pass: 4/9/19
• Engrossed: 5/20/19
• Report Pass: 5/22/19
• Chaptered: 6/25/19
• Enrolled: 6/28/19
• Passed: 7/9/19

Caption

An Act Concerning Social Workers.

Impact

If enacted, HB07198 will have a significant impact on state laws governing the practice of social work. It aims to ensure that only qualified individuals can use professional titles associated with social work. By tightening the regulations, the bill aligns local practices with recognized standards, enhancing the professional integrity of the field. This change is expected to improve the quality of services delivered to clients and promote trust in social work professionals.

Summary

House Bill 07198, also known as the Act Concerning Social Workers, is designed to establish clearer licensing requirements and professional standards for social workers in the state. It seeks to amend the existing statutes related to the licensing of master and clinical social workers, particularly in areas such as advertising services and the use of professional titles. This bill emphasizes the necessity for individuals to hold appropriate credentials and degrees from accredited programs to practice as social workers in Connecticut.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB07198 appears generally positive among legislators and professional organizations involved in social work. Supporters argue that the bill is essential for safeguarding public welfare by ensuring that only trained professionals provide social work services. However, there may be dissent among those who feel that the regulations could create barriers to entry for aspiring social workers, particularly those from diverse educational backgrounds.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around HB07198 include concerns about the potential exclusion of qualified individuals who may not meet the strictest educational requirements as outlined by the bill. Opponents argue that while it is crucial to maintain high standards, flexibility should also be available to consider experience and community needs. The debate highlights the tension between upholding professional standards and ensuring accessibility to the social work profession.