California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB298

Introduced
2/13/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  
Engrossed
5/22/17  
Engrossed
5/22/17  
Refer
6/15/17  
Refer
6/15/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Refer
6/25/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Refer
8/6/18  
Report Pass
8/15/18  

Caption

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

Impact

The bill specifically sets an exemption for funds in a judgment debtor's deposit account, allowing up to $1,200 to be retained without a claim. It also requires the Judicial Council to adjust the exemption amount every three years based on the California Consumer Price Index, ensuring that the exemption remains relevant to current economic conditions. This adjustment aims to protect individuals from being levied upon in a financial system that might otherwise render them destitute.

Summary

Senate Bill 298, introduced by Senator Wieckowski, addresses the enforcement of money judgments and the exemptions available to judgment debtors. The legislation modifies existing laws related to how claimants can assert exemptions from property levies. It establishes a clear procedure for filing a claim of exemption, allowing claimants to submit their filings either in person or by mail. Importantly, the bill extends the time frame for submitting claims depending on how the notice of levy was served, thereby providing judgment debtors with greater protection and time to respond.

Sentiment

Reactions to SB 298 have been largely supportive, as it seeks to enhance protections for individuals facing judgment levies. Proponents argue that the adjustments in exemption levels and the extension of claim filing times will help prevent unnecessary hardship on individuals who may struggle financially. However, some critics have raised concerns that the legislation could complicate the collection process for judgment creditors, potentially extending the time it takes to fulfill financial judgments.

Contention

Key points of contention hinge on balancing the rights of creditors to collect on judgments and the necessity to shield vulnerable debtors from overreach. While the bill introduces protective measures, it still maintains a requirement for judicial oversight in determining how exemptions are applied, which reflects an effort to find a middle ground between these opposing interests. The ongoing debate touches on broader issues of financial justice and consumer protection within California's legislative landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2837

Civil actions: enforcement of money judgments.

CA AB2039

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA AB3283

Enforcement of judgments: claims of exemption.

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB1725

Law enforcement settlements and judgments: reporting.

CA SB1022

Enforcement of civil rights.

CA AB631

Oil and gas: enforcement: penalties.

CA SB838

Victim compensation: use of force by a law enforcement officer.

CA AB1139

Recognition of tribal court money judgments: tribal sales taxes.

CA SB727

Human trafficking: civil actions.

Similar Bills

CA SB616

Enforcement of money judgments: exemptions.

CA AB774

Civil actions: enforcement of judgments.

CA AB3283

Enforcement of judgments: claims of exemption.

CA AB430

Debt collection: identity theft.

CA AB2837

Civil actions: enforcement of money judgments.