Connecticut 2019 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00992

Introduced
3/1/19  
Refer
3/1/19  
Refer
3/1/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Engrossed
5/14/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Chaptered
6/5/19  
Chaptered
6/5/19  
Enrolled
6/6/19  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Trust Act.

Impact

If enacted, the Trust Act will amend existing policies surrounding immigration detainers which historically allowed local law enforcement to retain individuals at the request of federal agencies like ICE for minor immigration violations. This sets a precedent highlighting the separation between state/local enforcement practices and federal immigration laws, advocating for more autonomy for local jurisdictions in these matters. Additionally, the bill ensures that the public can access records concerning law enforcement's interactions with federal agencies, increasing transparency in law enforcement practices.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 992, also referred to as 'The Trust Act', primarily addresses the interactions between state and local law enforcement agencies and federal immigration authorities. The bill prohibits law enforcement from detaining individuals based solely on civil immigration detainers unless paired with a judicial warrant. This change is significant as it directly impacts how state and local law enforcement agencies can respond to federal immigration enforcement actions, aiming to limit the role of local officials in enforcing federal immigration laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00992 is mixed. Supporters view the bill as a necessary step towards protecting the rights of individuals in police custody, particularly those from immigrant communities. They argue that it helps build trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement, which is critical for effective policing. Conversely, opponents claim that limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement may undermine public safety and complicate efforts to detain individuals with serious criminal backgrounds.

Contention

A notable point of contention lies in the debate over public safety versus civil rights. Critics argue that the bill could hinder law enforcement's ability to detain immigrants involved in serious crimes, potentially leading to a compromise in community safety. On the other hand, advocates emphasize the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals from being improperly detained and deported based on civil immigration offenses. This reflects deeper societal debates about the role of immigration in community safety and the balance between upholding rights and enforcing the law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB418

Health care coverage: nondiscrimination.

CA AB397

Unemployment insurance: benefits: disqualification: notice.

CA AB493

Crime: victims and witnesses: immigration violations.

MI HB5184

Health occupations: social workers; social work licensure requirements; modify, and include licensure for licensed clinical social workers. Amends secs. 18503, 18504, 18506, 18506a, 18509 & 18518 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.18503 et seq.) & adds sec. 18515a. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5185'23

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2602

Contracts against public policy: personal or professional services: digital replicas.

CA AB577

Health care coverage: maternal mental health.