Louisiana House Bill HB87

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/19/19
• Refer: 3/19/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 5/1/19
• Engrossed: 5/14/19
• Refer: 5/15/19
• Report Pass: 5/20/19
• Enrolled: 5/29/19
• Chaptered: 6/4/19
• Passed: 6/4/19

Caption

Provides for supplemental pay for fire protection officers of the Plaquemines Port Harbor and Terminal District (EN +$180,000 GF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 87 will positively influence the financial well-being of fire protection officers within the Plaquemines Port Harbor and Terminal District. By providing supplemental compensation, the bill ensures that these professionals receive equitable remuneration in recognition of their duties and responsibilities. The funding for this supplemental pay is expected to derive from self-generated revenue associated with the agency that employs these officers, thus alleviating some budgetary pressures on local government finances. An increase in the salary of these officers may also positively impact recruitment and retention efforts in the fire protection sector.

Summary

House Bill 87 aims to provide supplemental pay for full-time fire protection officers employed by the Plaquemines Port Harbor and Terminal District. The bill stipulates that these officers will receive an additional $500 per month, enhancing their compensation alongside what is currently provided by their agency. To qualify for this extra pay, fire protection officers must have completed at least one year of service, and those hired after March 31, 1986, are required to have successfully completed a certified fireman's training program. This initiative is intended to recognize and reward the essential services provided by fire protection officers in the regional port authority.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 87 appears to be supportive among legislators, emphasizing the importance of ensuring fire protection officers are fairly compensated for their work. The unanimous vote (37 yeas and 0 nays) during the Senate vote signifies a strong consensus on the need to enhance pay for this critical workforce. Stakeholders and community members likely recognize the necessity of supporting those who provide essential safety and emergency services, reflecting a collective valuing of public safety personnel.

Contention

Despite the bill's strong support, potential points of contention might arise regarding the broader implications of funding such supplemental pay through self-generated revenues. As the bill stipulates that the added financial burden should be absorbed within the agency's existing revenue streams, concerns may emerge about the impact on other budgetary needs or the sustainability of such funding practices. This balance of prioritizing public safety while ensuring responsible fiscal management could shape future discussions surrounding the bill and similar legislative initiatives.