Louisiana Senate Bill SB62

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/26/19
• Refer: 3/26/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 4/29/19
• Engrossed: 5/1/19
• Refer: 5/2/19
• Report Pass: 5/20/19
• Enrolled: 5/31/19
• Chaptered: 6/11/19
• Passed: 6/11/19

Caption

Requires the board of commissioners for the Calcasieu-Cameron Navigation District to meet once a quarter. (8/1/19)

Impact

The enactment of SB 62 is poised to enhance the operational efficiency of the Calcasieu-Cameron Navigation District. By formalizing the meeting schedule to a quarterly basis, it addresses potential gaps in communication and decision-making that may have arisen from less frequent meetings. The stipulation for special sessions also provides flexibility for urgent matters that require prompt attention, thus safeguarding the navigation district's responsiveness to pressing issues.

Summary

Senate Bill 62, introduced by Senator Morrish, amends the requirements for the board of commissioners of the Calcasieu-Cameron Navigation District in Louisiana. The bill mandates that the board meet in regular session once each quarter, thereby establishing a minimum frequency for official meetings. This change is aimed at ensuring consistent governance and oversight of the navigation district's operations while allowing for special sessions to be convened as necessary, either at the discretion of the board president or upon request by three members of the board.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 62 appears to be positive, as it is seen as a constructive step toward improving the governance structure of the navigation district. The proposed regulations may foster increased engagement from board members and potentially enhance transparency in the district's operations. Stakeholders likely view the requirement for regular meetings as a way to maintain accountability and ensure that the board is fulfilling its responsibilities effectively.

Contention

While no overt points of contention were noted in the discussions or voting history for SB 62, it is important to recognize that changes to governance structures, such as those proposed in the bill, can generate varying perspectives. Opponents of increased regulatory requirements could argue that imposed meeting schedules might constrain the board's ability to operate with enough flexibility to address emergent challenges informally, thus leading to a debate on the balance between regulation and efficient governance.