Alabama 2024 Regular Session

Alabama House Bill HB281

Introduced
3/5/24  
Introduced
3/5/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
3/5/24  
Refer
4/4/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Refer
4/4/24  
Enrolled
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Passed
5/8/24  
Enrolled
4/25/24  
Passed
5/8/24  

Caption

St. Clair County, coroner and deputy coroner, salary and expense allowance.

Impact

This bill will directly impact local government operations in St. Clair County by formalizing the compensation structure for the county coroner and deputy coroner. By increasing their expense allowances and converting them to salary, the bill seeks to enhance the financial stability and support for these positions. The monthly compensation adjustments are intended to reflect the demands placed on these officials while ensuring that they are compensated fairly for their service to the community.

Summary

HB281 proposes an additional expense allowance and salary adjustments for the coroner and deputy coroner of St. Clair County, Alabama. The bill outlines that starting October 1, 2024, the coroner will receive an additional monthly expense allowance of $525, along with their regular salary. In a similar manner, the deputy coroner is set to receive a yearly allowance of $2,600, which will also be converted into salary upon the expiration of the current coroner's term. This financial adjustment aims to provide better compensation for the officials in these roles, acknowledging their responsibilities and the nature of their work.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB281 appears to be predominantly positive, especially among local officials and community advocates who support better pay for public servants. Proponents argue that fair compensation for the coroner and deputy coroner is crucial for retaining qualified individuals in critical positions. There may, however, be minimal opposition, which could arise from concerns about budget allocations or prioritization of funds within county expenditures.

Contention

Notable points of contention may center around the funding for these increased salary measures and the impact on the county's budget. Critics might argue that the funding could be better utilized in other areas or that this represents an increase in public expenditure without addressing broader issues facing the county. However, as of now, the general reception of the bill indicates a focus on the positive aspects of compensating vital public service roles adequately.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.