Louisiana House Bill HB380

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 5/6/19

Caption

Authorizes a fee increase for the issuance and renewal of certain identification cards (EG +$416,000 SG RV See Note)

Impact

If enacted, HB 380 will directly modify the current fee structure related to driver's licenses and identification cards. This change is expected to generate an estimated increase of $416,000 in state revenue, which could provide critical funding for emergency services. The revenue distribution mechanism is detailed within the bill, directing funds specifically to the Emergency Response Network, which serves to bolster public safety and emergency preparedness across Louisiana.

Summary

House Bill 380, introduced by Representative Chaney, amends existing legislation to impose a fee increase for the issuance and renewal of driver's licenses and identification cards in Louisiana. The bill establishes that every applicant for a Class 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', or 'E' driver's license must pay an additional fee of $2.75. This fee will be allocated to the Louisiana Emergency Response Network, aimed at supporting emergency services within the state. The necessity for this fee increment is linked to enhancing the operational capabilities of the emergency response system.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 380 appears to be primarily positive among those who are focused on enhancing state emergency response capabilities. Supporters argue that the proposed fee is a necessary financial investment in public safety. However, there may be some concern among residents regarding the increase in fees, as it could place an additional financial burden on individuals seeking to obtain or renew their driver's licenses. The conversation around the bill is largely framed in terms of essential services versus the cost to residents.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from opposing viewpoints on the effectiveness of fee increases as a means of funding emergency services. While proponents argue that additional funding is crucial for improved emergency response, opponents may challenge the necessity of imposing new fees on citizens. The debate may center around balancing adequate funding for public services while ensuring that cost increases do not disproportionately affect lower-income residents or create barriers to obtaining necessary identification and licenses.