Louisiana Senate Bill SR10

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/19
• Refer: 4/9/19
• Report Pass: 5/6/19
• Passed: 5/7/19

Caption

Requests the Board of Regents to study the feasibility of updating TOPS reporting requirements.

Impact

The proposed study could lead to a significant impact on state educational policies, as it aims to provide legislators with a clearer picture of how the TOPS program influences student outcomes. By analyzing data such as employment status and industry sectors of TOPS alumni, the Board of Regents could generate valuable insights that inform future amendments to the program. This could result in changes that enhance the effectiveness of TOPS in fulfilling its mission of retaining talented students in Louisiana.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 10 urges the Board of Regents to assess the feasibility of updating the reporting requirements for the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS). This resolution is grounded in the belief that understanding the employment outcomes of TOPS recipients is crucial for informed legislative action. By obtaining data on scholarship recipients' post-graduation employment and residency, legislators aim to ensure that state appropriations are effectively benefiting citizens and contributing to the state's workforce retention efforts.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding SR10 appears to be supportive among educational advocates who believe that data-driven decision-making can improve state educational programs. However, potential concerns could arise about privacy and the implications of sharing recipient data among various state departments, which may elicit debate about the balance between data collection and individual confidentiality.

Contention

While the resolution itself is a request for a study rather than a direct policy change, it could face opposition from those wary of increased governmental oversight on educational programs. Critics might challenge the need for enhanced reporting requirements, arguing that current systems are sufficient, or that additional data collection may burden academic institutions without yielding proportional benefits. The conversation around SR10 reflects broader discussions on educational accountability and the role of state government in overseeing financial aid programs.