Louisiana House Bill HR134

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/24/12
• Passed: 5/29/12

Caption

Requests the La. Student Financial Assistance Commission, in consultation with the Board of Regents, to study the feasibility of requiring drug testing for students to qualify for a TOPS award

Impact

If the resolution leads to the implementation of drug testing prerequisites, it could significantly impact state education laws concerning financial assistance programs. The proposed study aims to evaluate whether such testing could deter drug use among students and potentially reduce misuse of the TOPS funding. Should drug testing be instituted as a requirement, it could alter the landscape of qualification criteria for state-funded scholarships, influencing both candidate eligibility and state policy regarding student support.

Summary

House Resolution 134, introduced by Representative Barrow, calls for the Louisiana Student Financial Assistance Commission to conduct a study on the feasibility of implementing drug testing for students seeking a Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) award. The TOPS program provides merit-based scholarships that cover tuition costs for eligible Louisiana postsecondary education institutions. With nearly 42,000 projected TOPS recipients, the resolution emphasizes the necessity of ensuring that taxpayer money is utilized effectively for its intended purpose: supporting students focused on their education.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR134 appears to hover around a desire for accountability in education funding, with proponents likely viewing drug testing as a necessary measure to protect public resources. However, there may be dissent regarding the implications of such testing, particularly concerning privacy rights and the potential stigmatization of students who might struggle with substance use. Supporters will argue this fosters a more responsible approach to scholarship funding, whereas opponents may raise ethical concerns regarding drug testing practices among students.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the philosophical debate regarding the balance between ensuring responsible use of public funds and respecting individual rights. Critics may argue that drug testing would unfairly penalize students, particularly those in difficult circumstances, while proponents might contend that it is a reasonable step to uphold the integrity of the TOPS program. The outcome of the subsequent study requested by the resolution may further ignite discussions about public education policy in Louisiana and influence future legislative actions on similar matters.