Louisiana House Bill HR226

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/28/19
• Refer: 5/28/19

Caption

Requests that the Board of Regents provide for an updated study and report relative to the issues addressed in the 2012 report by Eva Klein and Associates pertaining to postsecondary education in the Shreveport-Bossier region

Impact

If passed, HR226 would not immediately alter state laws but would set in motion an updated analysis that could impact future legislative initiatives regarding higher education structures in the region. The Board of Regents is tasked with reviewing the necessity for a consolidated institution of higher education. This could eventually influence funding, governance, and the overall strategic direction for universities within the state, particularly for those serving the Shreveport-Bossier area.

Summary

House Resolution 226, introduced by Representative Glover, seeks to urge the Louisiana Board of Regents to conduct an updated study regarding the issues highlighted in a previous 2012 report concerning postsecondary education in the Shreveport-Bossier region. The original report, prepared by Eva Klein and Associates, suggested several strategies for achieving a more comprehensive public university in the area, including the potential merger of Louisiana Tech University and Louisiana State University at Shreveport. Given the considerable time that has elapsed since the initial findings, the resolution reflects ongoing discussions about the viability of this consolidation and the need for a current assessment.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HR226 appears cautiously optimistic. Supporters may see it as a proactive approach to enhancing educational opportunities and addressing regional needs, while opponents could express concerns about the consolidation's implications on local identity and the distinctive roles of existing institutions. The discussions indicate a broader dialogue on how best to serve higher education needs within local communities while ensuring institutional strength.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the historical context of previous attempts to consolidate these institutions, including an unsuccessful related bill. Some stakeholders may argue that a merger could dilute the unique offerings that each university presents, potentially harming enrollment and community perceptions. Meanwhile, advocates for consolidation assert that it could lead to more efficient resource utilization and an increase in academic quality and accessibility for students in the Shreveport-Bossier area.