California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1871

Introduced
1/16/18  
Introduced
1/16/18  
Refer
1/29/18  
Report Pass
3/14/18  
Report Pass
3/14/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Refer
3/15/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Refer
4/23/18  
Refer
4/23/18  
Refer
5/2/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Enrolled
8/23/18  
Enrolled
8/23/18  
Chaptered
9/18/18  
Chaptered
9/18/18  
Passed
9/18/18  

Caption

Charter schools: free and reduced-price meals.

Impact

The bill alters existing laws related to the operation of charter schools, aligning their food service obligations with those of traditional public schools. It acknowledges California's high child poverty rate and seeks to ensure that all children, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, have equal opportunities to receive nourishment that supports their health and educational success. By establishing a clear requirement, AB 1871 holds charter schools accountable for the nutritional needs of their students, thereby fostering equity in education.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1871, introduced by Assemblymember Bonta, mandates that charter schools in California provide free or reduced-price meals to needy pupils. Specifically, it requires these schools to offer one nutritionally adequate meal each school day, starting from the 2019-2020 school year. For new charter schools opened after July 1, 2019, the implementation must occur by the beginning of the following school year. This legislation aims to address food insecurity among the roughly 340,000 low-income pupils enrolled in charter schools, who currently lack guaranteed access to such meals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1871 has been largely positive among advocates of children's health and educational equity. Supporters, including educators and child welfare organizations, view this bill as a critical step toward mitigating child poverty effects linked to academic performance. However, some debate exists regarding the financial implications for charter schools, with concerns about the feasibility of implementing these requirements without adequate funding and resources.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the financial burden that may be placed on charter schools and the potential challenges in meeting the nutritional standards outlined in the bill. Critics argue that the mandate could strain the operational budgets of smaller charter schools that struggle to secure funding for meal programs. Additionally, the bill emphasizes the need for charter schools to collaborate with established school food authorities, which may raise logistical concerns.

Additional_notes

It is also important to note that the state is required to reimburse local agencies for any costs mandated by this bill, ensuring that schools are not left to shoulder the financial burden alone. This component of the legislation aims to minimize adverse impacts on the educational budgets of charter schools.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB842

Child nutrition: school, childcare, and preschool meals.

CA AB354

School meals: free or reduced-price meals.

CA SB348

Pupil meals.

CA SB1080

Pupil nutrition: school meals: halal and kosher food options.

CA AB2316

Pupil nutrition: substances: prohibition.