Louisiana Senate Bill SB95

Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/20
• Refer: 2/24/20
• Refer: 3/9/20

Caption

Provides for the board of commissioners of the St. Mary Levee District. (8/1/20)

Impact

The implications of SB 95 enhance local governance by placing more responsibility in the hands of elected representatives and potentially increasing accountability to the local population. By involving the legislative delegation in the appointment of the at-large member, the bill aims to ensure that the board better reflects the needs and interests of St. Mary Parish residents. Overall, this could improve trust and cooperation between local officials and the community they serve. Furthermore, this amendment outlines clearer parameters for governance of the Levee District, which is crucial for effective flood management and environmental safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 95 is legislation that amends the appointment process for the board of commissioners of the St. Mary Levee District in Louisiana. The bill reduces the number of appointees from the governor from nine to eight, indicating a shift towards a more locally controlled approach for board representation. Instead of the governor appointing all members, the bill allows the legislative delegation representing St. Mary Parish to nominate one at-large member, subject to Senate confirmation. This change seeks to further involve local governance in board appointments, enhancing community engagement in the decision-making process.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 95 appears to be largely positive among local governance advocates who view it as a necessary step towards decentralization and local empowerment. There is an underlying sense that this bill strengthens representative democracy by allowing local leaders to have a say in crucial infrastructure management. However, there remains a discussion about whether such adjustments might dilute the governor's oversight and influence over critical regional boards. Some cautious voices highlight the need for balance to ensure that accountability is not sacrificed in the pursuit of local control.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 95 revolve around the mix of state oversight and local control. Proponents argue that increased local input on the board of commissioners will better serve the district's interests and improve decision-making that directly impacts the community. Opponents, however, may express concerns that reducing the governor's direct control could lead to mismanagement or conflict of interests at the local level. This tension between state authority and local input is a recurring theme in discussions of governance reforms.