California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1085

Introduced
2/12/18  
Refer
2/22/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Engrossed
5/10/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/29/18  
Refer
5/29/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Chaptered
9/28/18  
Chaptered
9/28/18  

Caption

Public employees: leaves of absence: exclusive bargaining representative service.

Impact

The passage of SB 1085 impacts existing labor relations statutes within California, enhancing the protections granted to public employees who engage in union representation activities. It requires that public employers accommodate such requests for leaves, reinforcing the role of unions in representing employees within various government sectors. The bill ensures employees can maintain their positions, seniority, and benefits while actively participating in their unions.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 1085 introduces a significant amendment to the Government Code concerning the rights of public employees regarding leaves of absence for union activities. The bill mandates that public employers grant reasonable leaves of absence without loss of compensation or benefits when requested by the exclusive representative of an employee. This allows employees to serve as stewards or officers of their respective representative organizations, which can include local or national entities. The provisions are meant to enhance employee participation in union activities without jeopardizing their employment status or benefits.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1085 appears to be supportive among labor organizations, which view the bill as a crucial step in protecting the rights and representation of workers. Proponents argue that the bill exemplifies a commitment to labor rights and strengthens collective bargaining frameworks. Conversely, some critics may voice concerns about the potential cost implications for public employers, particularly regarding compensation reimbursements during employee leaves. However, the legislation's overall purpose is framed positively in the context of enhancing labor relations.

Contention

As with many changes to public employment laws, SB 1085 might encounter contention regarding its implementation and the specifics of how it influences existing collective bargaining agreements. Provisions that allow employees to take leave for union duties while ensuring they receive full benefits and are not liable for injuries during this time could invite discussions regarding employer liabilities and the financial responsibilities placed on public entities. The requirement for reimbursement of salaries to the employer by the union represents a delicate balance that will need to be navigated through administrative procedures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2048

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB83

Collective bargaining: Judicial Council.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB314

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB969

Collective bargaining: Legislature.