Louisiana 2020 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB276

Introduced
2/27/20  
Introduced
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Refer
3/9/20  

Caption

Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges and to prohibit a mandatory retirement age for public office holders and public employment.

Impact

Should SB276 be enacted, it would alter existing state law by eliminating the stipulation that judges must retire upon reaching the age of seventy. This change could have lasting implications, allowing experienced judges to continue serving in their positions, thereby potentially enhancing the judiciary's institutional knowledge and stability. Furthermore, the bill signals a broader inclination towards inclusivity in public service roles, advocating for the capabilities of older adults within the professional arena.

Summary

Senate Bill 276, authored by Senator Jackson, proposes a significant constitutional amendment by aiming to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges in Louisiana. This bill would also establish that no individual should be denied the right to hold public office or engage in public employment solely based on their age. The proposed changes are designed to reflect modern views on age and competency, recognizing that age should not inherently restrict an individual's ability to serve in public roles.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB276 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among proponents who advocate for the removal of age-related barriers. Many supporters argue that retention of experienced judges is crucial for the judiciary. Conversely, some may raise concerns about the implications of extending judicial tenure without a mandatory retirement age, questioning whether it could hinder opportunities for younger judges or affect the dynamism of the legal system.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussion of SB276 revolve around the potential for ageism and the balance between experience and fresh perspectives within the judiciary. While the bill touts the benefits of allowing judges to serve longer, opponents may argue that a set retirement age ensures the judiciary remains vibrant and reflective of changing societal values. Such debates mark a conflict between valuing experience and ensuring opportunities for emerging legal professionals.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SB86

Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges. (2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (1/1/27)

LA HB22

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the mandatory retirement age for judges

LA SB5

Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age of judges.

LA SB278

Constitutional amendment to remove the mandatory retirement age for judges. (2/3 - CA13s1(A))

LA HB96

(Constitutional amendment) Removes the mandatory retirement age of judges (EN DECREASE FC SG EX)

LA HB366

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the mandatory retirement age for judges

LA SB276

Constitutional amendment to establish a mandatory retirement age for certain elected officials. (2/3 - CA13s1(A))

LA HB63

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides relative to the mandatory retirement of judges (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA HB27

Provides relative to the mandatory retirement age for judges

LA SCR46

Proposes constitutional amendment to increase mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 72.

Similar Bills

WV HB3332

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3330

Creating family court circuits and assigning the number of family court judges in each family court circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

WV HB3329

Creating judicial circuits and assigning the number of circuit judges in each circuit to be elected in the 2024 election

NJ SCR72

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR73

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

NJ SCR96

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

NJ SCR83

Proposes temporary constitutional amendment allowing State constitutional convention convened to reform system of property taxation to propose statutory changes.

CA ACA13

Voting thresholds.