Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2823

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to state contracts with and investments in certain companies doing business in the Russian Federation.

Impact

The introduction of HB 2823 signals Texas's commitment to aligning its contracting policies with federal sanctions against Russia. By mandating that governmental entities verify the status of companies regarding their business operations in Russia, it elevates the due diligence required before entering contracts. This legislative move could lead to significant changes in the bidding and procurement processes within the state government, as companies must demonstrate they do not engage in scrutinized operations in the Russian context to be eligible for contracts over a specified value.

Summary

House Bill 2823 addresses state contracts and investments involving certain companies conducting business in the Russian Federation. This legislation aims to enhance the state's ability to scrutinize and potentially prohibit contracts with businesses that engage in activities related to the Russian government or its agencies. The intention is to create a clear regulatory framework that could prevent state funds from being used to support companies linked to the Russian Federation, particularly those that might be providing military supplies or otherwise supporting government actions contrary to U.S. policy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2823 may be largely supportive, reflecting a broader national sentiment favoring actions against businesses that support the Russian government amid geopolitical tensions. However, some concerns could arise regarding the potential impact on local businesses that may have indirect ties or operations in the region, which could complicate compliance and create unintended consequences for economic activity within Texas.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the definitions and scope of 'scrutinized business operations' as outlined in the bill. Critics may argue that the bill could inadvertently punish companies without clear or direct connection to the Russian government or that it may result in overregulation that stifles business operations within Texas. Additionally, the degree of compliance and oversight required by governmental entities could be burdensome, especially for smaller contracts or businesses navigating international markets.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Government Code

  • Chapter 2270. Prohibition On Investing Public Money In Certain Investments
    • Section: 0001
    • Section: 0002
    • Section: 0201
    • Section: 0203
    • Section: 0204
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

TX SB1189

Identical Relating to state contracts with and investments in certain companies doing business in the Russian Federation.

Similar Bills

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

TX SB1680

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by state agencies.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

TX SB68

Relating to contracting issues of state agencies, including ethics issues related to state contracting.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA SB770

Common interest developments: EV charging stations.

NJ A2517

Prohibits employment of illegal aliens and requires use of E-Verify program in public contracts.