Texas Senate Bill SB120

Texas 2017 - 85th 1st C.S.

Caption

Relating to investment prohibitions and divestment requirements for certain investments of public money in companies involved in the border wall between the United States and Mexico.

Impact

If enacted, SB120 will significantly affect how state investments are managed concerning companies associated with the border wall. The Texas comptroller will be tasked with compiling and maintaining a list of scrutinized companies that engage in relevant business operations. This includes companies engaged in planning, constructing, or maintaining border wall projects and provisions that may direct state and municipal funds away from them. By implementing this bill, the state of Texas aims to ensure that public funds do not support enterprises involved in contentious activities deemed harmful or objectionable by the legislature.

Summary

SB120 is a legislative act aimed at establishing investment prohibitions and divestment requirements for public money in companies involved in the construction and maintenance of the border wall between the United States and Mexico. The bill seeks to amend existing sections of the Government Code to include stricter definitions and criteria for companies that are considered to be part of scrutinized business operations related to the border wall. This legislation aligns with broader concerns about corporate involvement in controversial government projects and aims to prevent state funds from supporting such initiatives.

Contention

The introduction of SB120 has spurred considerable debate among lawmakers and interest groups. Proponents assert that preventing public investment in companies building the border wall reflects the state's commitment to ethical governance and social responsibility. However, critics may argue that this legislation could adversely affect companies that, while involved in such projects, also provide essential services and jobs to local communities. Furthermore, potential legal challenges may arise regarding the retroactive impact of divestment practices on existing contracts and partnerships within the state.