Louisiana House Bill HCR29

Louisiana 2020 2nd Special Session

• Introduced: 10/12/20
• Refer: 10/12/20
• Report Pass: 10/14/20
• Engrossed: 10/15/20
• Refer: 10/19/20
• Report Pass: 10/21/20
• Passed: 10/22/20

Caption

Amends administrative rules regarding leave of absence days for clients of intermediate care facilities (Items #28 and 29)

Impact

The resolution amends rule LAC 50:VII.33103(A)(2) to allow for retroactive and prospective application regarding leaves of absence. This amendment is significant as it expands the number of allowable days for leave from ICF/ID facilities under specific conditions, thereby ensuring that families do not have to incur extra costs beyond the Medicaid per diem for this critical care. It also addresses the effects of the ongoing public health emergency and its implications on the care of individuals with disabilities who are unable to care for themselves.

Summary

HCR29 is a resolution passed by the Louisiana Legislature aimed at amending rules pertaining to leave of absence days for residents of intermediate care facilities for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (ICF/ID). This legislators' action primarily responds to the financial strain that families have faced during the COVID-19 pandemic, as many have opted to care for their loved ones at home. The bill seeks to address the needs of these families by modifying existing regulations that limit the number of Medicaid-covered days for leave of absence, thus alleviating financial burdens during this emergency period.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR29 appears positive among legislators, as it expresses a strong intent to support families caring for individuals with disabilities. This sentiment is reflected in the unanimous voting outcome (89-0), indicating broad bipartisan support for the resolution. This suggests recognition of the challenges families are facing and a commitment to offer support during particularly tough times.

Contention

While the resolution does not exhibit major contention among legislators, its provisions are contingent on approval from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for implementation. This approval process could introduce delays or complications, as federal regulations and feedback may shape the final application of these amendments. There are likely discussions around the implications of the changes and how they interact with federal guidelines, which may lead to further scrutiny.