Louisiana House Bill HB202

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/25/21
• Refer: 3/25/21
• Refer: 4/12/21
• Refer: 4/15/21
• Refer: 4/19/21
• Report Pass: 4/26/21

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Provides for an increased vote requirement when enacting certain new tax incentives (RE SEE FISC NOTE GF RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 202 would considerably change the landscape for tax policy in Louisiana, ensuring that any new tax incentives are democratically debated and agreed upon by a supermajority, thereby reinforcing accountability. The provision for expiration without renewal could prevent legislative bloat and encourage periodic review of tax policies to ensure they remain relevant and effective. By requiring a higher threshold for passing new tax measures, the bill aims to stabilize the state’s financial footing by limiting hasty fiscal decisions that could lead to budget shortfalls.

Summary

House Bill 202, a proposed constitutional amendment in Louisiana, aims to introduce a more stringent voting requirement for enacting new tax incentives, including exemptions, exclusions, deductions, rebates, and credits. Starting January 1, 2023, any new tax incentive would require a two-thirds majority from the elected members of each house of the legislature to be passed. Additionally, passed tax incentives will face expiration after four years unless they are renewed with another two-thirds vote. This measure seeks to impose greater legislative oversight on fiscal policies that might impact the state’s revenue structure significantly.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 202 appears mixed, with proponents highlighting it as a necessary reform for fiscal responsibility and transparency in legislative processes. They argue that requiring a supermajority discourages the government from making impulsive financial decisions that could lead to long-term fiscal issues. Conversely, opponents may see this measure as a potential hindrance to important economic development initiatives by making it more challenging to implement needed tax incentives that could foster growth.

Contention

While HB 202 is positioned as a step towards fiscal prudence, it could lead to contention over its implications for future economic initiatives. Critics might argue that the rigidity imposed by this bill could stifle innovation and adaptability in tax policy, making it difficult for the state to respond swiftly to economic needs. Furthermore, as the bill ties the continuation of tax incentives to legislative approval, concerns may arise regarding the political maneuvering that could ensue, potentially making valuable tax relief more difficult to secure for both individuals and businesses.