Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB237

Introduced
3/26/21  
Introduced
3/26/21  
Refer
3/26/21  
Refer
3/26/21  
Refer
4/12/21  

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Jerry Lacaze v. City of Natchitoches, et al.

Impact

By approving this bill, the state ensures compliance with a court judgment, thus reinforcing the principle of rule of law within the judicial system. The provision specifies that payment will only be made upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the finality of the judgment and the presentation of necessary documentation to the state treasurer. The clear stipulations regarding potential conflicts between the judgment and the proposed laws are designed to maintain the integrity of both legal and legislative processes.

Summary

House Bill 237 seeks to appropriate funds from the Louisiana State General Fund, amounting to $10,000, for the purpose of fulfilling a consent judgment associated with the case 'Jerry Lacaze versus City of Natchitoches, et al.' This payment is intended for costs awarded in the judgment including principal, interest, court costs, and expert witness fees accrued in the legal proceeding. The measure underscores the state's responsibility to honor judicial decisions and illustrates the procedural framework for such appropriations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 237 appears to be neutral, as it primarily serves to carry out a court mandate rather than introduce new policy changes or regulations. Given its specific focus on funding appropriation, there seems to be limited contention or passionate debate surrounding this bill. It is seen largely as a technical necessity to adhere to established legal norms rather than a politically charged issue.

Contention

One notable aspect of HB 237 is the inclusion of provisions that halt the accrual of interest on the judgment from the effective date of the bill, which suggests a strategic approach by lawmakers to mitigate additional financial burdens on the state. While the bill aims to address a particular legal obligation, it may raise questions about priorities in state budgeting, particularly in terms of funding legal settlements that arise from municipal disputes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1200

Enforcement of judgments: renewal and interest.

AZ HB2297

Judgments; liens; homestead exemption

KY HB801

AN ACT relating to Canadian money judgments.

CA AB1119

Enforcement of judgments.

CA AB905

Money judgments of other jurisdictions.

CA SB642

Civil actions: renewal of judgments.

CA SB355

Judgment debtor employers: Employment Development Department.

UT SB0326

Judgment Renewal Modifications