Connecticut 2021 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06676

Introduced
5/7/21  
Refer
5/7/21  
Refer
5/7/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Report Pass
5/19/21  
Refer
5/21/21  
Refer
5/21/21  
Report Pass
5/27/21  
Report Pass
5/27/21  
Engrossed
6/5/21  
Engrossed
6/5/21  
Report Pass
6/6/21  
Report Pass
6/6/21  
Passed
6/8/21  
Passed
6/8/21  
Chaptered
6/24/21  
Chaptered
6/24/21  
Enrolled
6/28/21  
Enrolled
6/28/21  
Passed
7/13/21  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Repeal Of The Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land To The Town Of Farmington.

Impact

The enactment of HB 6676 would effectively restore the state's control over the land in question, reversing previous legislative actions that facilitated its conveyance to the town. This decision could have broader implications for how state lands are allocated and managed, potentially reinforcing the concept that local municipalities should operate within a framework established by state laws regarding public land use. It could also set a precedent for future legislative actions concerning land conveyances.

Summary

House Bill 6676 is titled 'An Act Concerning The Repeal Of The Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land To The Town Of Farmington.' This legislation focuses on reversing a prior decision that had granted a specific parcel of state land to Farmington. The repeal is designed to address concerns regarding the management and use of this land, ensuring that it remains under state jurisdiction rather than being transferred to a local government for its administration.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 6676 appears to be positive among those who prioritize state oversight of land management. Supporters might argue that maintaining state control ensures consistent standards and regulations applicable to all state properties. Conversely, opponents may express concern about the implications for local governance and the town's ability to utilize land resources effectively for its community needs.

Contention

The key point of contention in discussions about HB 6676 revolves around the balance of power between state and local governments. While proponents stress the importance of state oversight in land use to prevent any mismanagement or conflicts that may arise at the local level, critics may argue that this repeal undermines local autonomy and fails to consider local needs and priorities in land usage. The discussion reflects broader conflicts in public policy about local control versus state authority.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00458

An Act Concerning The Conveyance Of Two Parcels Of State Land In The Town Of Windsor.

CT HB05517

An Act Repealing The Prior Conveyance Of And Reconveying A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Wilton.

CT HB05521

An Act Concerning A Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Cheshire.

CT SB00460

An Act Concerning The Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Enfield.

CT HB05518

An Act Concerning The Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Canton.

CT SB00461

An Act Concerning The Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Somers.

CT HB05520

An Act Concerning The Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Berlin.

CT HB05519

An Act Concerning A Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Newington.

CT SB00459

An Act Concerning A Conveyance Of A Parcel Of State Land In The City Of Bridgeport.

CT HB05522

An Act Leasing A Parcel Of State Land In The Town Of Woodstock.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.