Louisiana Senate Bill SCR9

Louisiana 2021 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/12/21
• Refer: 4/12/21
• Report Pass: 4/21/21
• Refer: 4/26/21
• Report Pass: 5/3/21
• Passed: 5/4/21
• Engrossed: 5/4/21
• Refer: 5/5/21
• Refer: 5/18/21
• Refer: 5/19/21
• Report Pass: 5/24/21

Caption

Approves the annual state integrated coastal protection plan for Fiscal Year 2022, as adopted by the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board.

Impact

The approval of SCR9 is significant for state laws as it formalizes the commitment of Louisiana towards addressing coastal erosion and enhancing environmental conditions in the coastal region. The bill ensures that funding and implementation priorities align with the needs identified in the integrated coastal protection plan. By establishing a structured annual process for coastal management, the bill actively contributes to long-term resilience against environmental challenges, including hurricanes and flooding.

Summary

SCR9, also known as the Louisiana Annual State Integrated Coastal Protection Plan for Fiscal Year 2022, aims to approve the state’s coastal protection and restoration plan as adopted by the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board. The bill recognizes the ongoing coastal crisis faced by Louisiana and seeks to outline a comprehensive strategy for the protection, conservation, and restoration of Louisiana's coastal areas. It interlinks various projects such as coastal protection, environmental compliance, and hurricane protection, promoting a priority-based approach to funding these initiatives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR9 appears predominantly supportive, as legislators acknowledged the importance of a coordinated approach to coastal protection. It was well-received, with a unanimous vote of 96–0 in the House, indicating a strong legislative consensus on the necessity of the proposed coastal initiatives. Stakeholders and community members engaged in public hearings likely recognized the imperative nature of coastal restoration efforts amid ongoing environmental threats.

Contention

While the bill saw broad support, notable discussions focused on the implementation details and the adequacy of public engagement processes. Critics have historically expressed concerns about whether local communities are sufficiently consulted and involved in decision-making about coastal projects that directly affect their livelihoods and environments. The requirement of public hearings is crucial for transparency and addressing potential local grievances; thus, scrutiny remains on ensuring these participatory measures are robust and effective.