Louisiana Senate Bill SB79

Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/25/22
• Refer: 2/25/22
• Refer: 3/14/22
• Report Pass: 4/11/22
• Engrossed: 4/18/22
• Refer: 4/19/22
• Report Pass: 5/2/22
• Enrolled: 5/12/22
• Chaptered: 5/17/22
• Passed: 5/17/22

Caption

Designates a portion of LA 16 in St. Helena Parish as the "Trooper George Baker Memorial Highway". (8/1/22) (EN +$1,100 SG EX See Note)

Impact

The implementation of SB79 introduces a specific requirement for local or private funding to cover the costs associated with the fabrication, installation, and mounting of the highway signs establishing the memorial. The cost ceiling for each sign is set at five hundred fifty dollars. This provision requires local stakeholders to contribute financially, thereby engaging the community in the memorial process while also transferring part of the financial responsibility from the state department. This aspect may foster local participation and investment in their infrastructure.

Summary

Senate Bill 79 aims to designate a section of Louisiana Highway 16 in St. Helena Parish as the 'Trooper George Baker Memorial Highway'. This legislation memorializes Trooper George Baker, who served the state, by officially naming a stretch of a highway in his honor. The designated area stretches from the Tangipahoa Parish line to the Livingston Parish line, indicating a specific geographic impact created by the bill. The act proposes not only the recognition of Trooper Baker but also gives a sense of pride and remembrance to the community and state officers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB79 appears to be largely positive among lawmakers and the community. The bill received overwhelming support during the voting process, passing with 98 votes in favor and none against. Such unanimous support reflects a consensus on honoring Trooper Baker and supporting local memorialization efforts. This type of legislation typically garners emotional support, as it respects and recognizes service members' sacrifices.

Contention

While the bill is positioned favorably and is supported broadly, points of potential contention could arise concerning the reliance on local funding for sign installation. This approach may pose challenges if local resources are limited or if sustained financial obligations create disputes. Additionally, defining the parameters of what constitutes eligible local funding could lead to further discussions if various stakeholders feel the financial responsibilities are inequally distributed.