Louisiana Senate Bill SB2

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/19
• Refer: 1/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 4/15/19
• Engrossed: 4/17/19
• Refer: 4/22/19
• Report Pass: 5/13/19
• Enrolled: 5/29/19
• Chaptered: 6/1/19
• Passed: 6/1/19

Caption

Designates a portion of LA 25 in Washington Parish as the "Jerry Joe Rayborn Memorial Highway". (8/1/19) (EN +$1,100 SG EX See Note)

Impact

The passage of SB 2 contributes to the state's efforts to recognize and memorialize significant individuals through infrastructure. It empowers local communities to preserve historical and cultural memory through public space. As a result, it establishes an official mechanism where important local figures can be commemorated, thereby fostering community pride and recognition. The financial requirement for sign installation indicates a collaborative approach between state and local entities in executing such designations.

Summary

Senate Bill 2, introduced by Senator Mizell, aims to designate a segment of Louisiana Highway 25 in Washington Parish as the 'Jerry Joe Rayburn Memorial Highway.' This bill serves to honor the legacy of Jerry Joe Rayborn by officially marking this highway section with signs. Effective from August 1, 2019, the bill not only sets forth the designation but also addresses the practical considerations for installing the required signage, specifically stipulating that costs must be covered by local or private funds up to a limit of $550 per sign.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 2 appears to be positive, particularly among those who knew Jerry Joe Rayborn or have a vested interest in local historical recognition. Supporters likely view this as a fitting tribute to a community figure, enhancing local identity and heritage. There may be a sense of pride in having a highway dedicate their name, reflecting on shared memories and contributions.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, there may be some contention regarding the responsibility of funding the signage. The requirement of local or private funds could limit the execution of such memorials if local resources are insufficient. This raises questions about accessibility for communities to honor their figures adequately and whether dependence on private funding could lead to inconsistencies in commemorations across the state.