California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SR48

Introduced
6/10/19  
Introduced
6/10/19  
Refer
6/10/19  
Refer
6/10/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Passed
9/6/19  

Caption

Relative to commerce.

Impact

The resolution aims to urge U.S. leaders to avoid imposing tariffs on Mexican goods, which could threaten California's economy. It discusses the detrimental effects that tariffs, particularly those proposed by then-President Trump on various products, could have on trade between California and Mexico, potentially resulting in job losses for Californians. The bill aligns with California's strategic interests, advocating for the continuation of collaborative economic relations that play a vital role in job creation and cross-border commerce.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 48, introduced by Senator Hueso and co-authored by several other Senators, addresses the importance of the economic relationship between California and Mexico. It emphasizes the growth in trade resulting from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), highlighting the significant economic integration between the three countries. The resolution notes that California’s relationship with Mexico is crucial for its economy, which ranks as the fifth largest in the world, and references the critical economic activities within the California-Mexico border region, supporting over 566,000 jobs in the state.

Sentiment

Supporters of SR48 express a strong sentiment favoring free trade and the avoidance of tariffs that could jeopardize California's economy. The resolution aims to foster a cooperative approach towards trade relations with Mexico, stressing the mutual economic benefits of such partnerships. Conversely, the underlying fear associated with the proposed tariffs accentuates concerns about economic insecurity and job losses, making the sentiment surrounding the bill generally positive in advocating for trade, but cautious regarding the implications of heightened tariffs.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from the contrasting views on trade policies implemented by the federal government. Proponents of the resolution are particularly concerned about President Trump's tariffs, which were seen as detrimental to California businesses and workers. The resolution expresses a desire for U.S. leaders to reconsider trade strategies that threaten existing agreements and may lead to retaliatory measures from Mexico. By framing the resolution within the context of economic cooperation, it illustrates broader debates concerning protectionist policies and their impact on state economies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SR124

Relative to recognizing the United Mexican States’ First Woman President, Dr. Claudia Sheinbaum.

CA AJR12

Tijuana River: cross-border pollution.

CA ACR99

Immigrant Heritage Month.

CA ACR206

Immigrant Heritage Month.

CA SCR57

Sister state relationship with the Philippine Province of Bulacan.

CA SR104

Relative to California-Mexico Advocacy Day.

CA SB831

Agricultural workers: immigration: parole.

CA AB1122

Commercial harbor craft: equipment.

CA SB1482

Commercial financing.

CA ACR149

Irish American Heritage Month: 100th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the United States and Ireland.

Similar Bills

CA SB898

Tribal gaming: compact amendment ratification.

CA AB1658

Tribal gaming: compact amendment ratification.

CA SB1145

Gambling Control Act.

CA AB506

California State University: graduation requirement: ethnic studies.

CA AB209

California State University: Agricultural education: professional doctorate degrees.

CA SB68

Public postsecondary education: exemption from nonresident tuition.

CA AB327

COVID-19 vaccination status: prohibition on required disclosure.

CA AB1749

Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act: University of California.