Louisiana 2022 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB916

Introduced
4/4/22  
Refer
4/5/22  

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. State of La. through the Dept. of Transportation

Impact

The implementation of HB 916 will have a direct fiscal impact on the state's budget for the specified fiscal year. By appropriating these funds, Louisiana acknowledges its legal obligations and demonstrates a commitment to fulfilling court orders. This bill functions to ensure that the judgment is paid effectively and clarifies the conditions for such payments, potentially preventing additional legal complications.

Summary

House Bill 916 aims to appropriate $15,000 from the State General Fund for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to cover a consent judgment against the state arising from a legal case involving the State of Louisiana and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The judgment pertains to a suit consolidated with claims from plaintiffs David L. Ocmand and Linda C. Ocmand regarding circumstances that led to the state being held financially accountable. The bill outlines how this payment is to be processed and emphasizes that funds will only be allocated for the final judgment amount, which includes principal, interest, court costs, and any awarded expert witness fees.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 916 appears to be neutral, focusing primarily on the necessity of compliance with a court order rather than drawing strong public or legislative debate. As it addresses a legal settlement, the discussions likely center more on procedural concerns than on ideological divides or contentious policy implications.

Contention

While the bill itself is straightforward, the underlying case may raise some questions about previous state actions and liabilities. The potential contention lies in how such judgments affect future state budgeting and the responsibilities of the Department of Transportation. Critics might also examine the broader implications of governmental financial accountability in similar future cases.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA HB367

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled David L. Ocmand et al. v. Town of Brusly et al. c/w Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. the State of Louisiana c/w State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com. v. the State of Louisiana

LA HB548

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled David L. Ocmand et al. v. Town of Brusly et al. c/w Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. the State of Louisiana c/w State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com. v. the State of Louisiana

LA HB45

Appropriates funds for payment of a consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Oliver et al.

LA HB89

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. and Alvin McMillian v. City of New Orleans, et al.

LA HB44

Appropriates funds for payment of a consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled State of La., through the Dept. of Transportation and Development v. Martin T. Frey et al.

LA HB82

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state of Louisiana in the suit entitled "Janelle Ford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al"

LA HB108

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development

LA HB611

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state through the Dept. of Transportation and Development in the suit entitled Brooke Douet v. Amber Nicole Leblanc et al.

LA HB95

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Adrienne Lezina v. the State of Louisiana, et al.

LA HB341

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Erika Wagner v. Melissa M. Bordelon et al.

Similar Bills

LA HB1017

Appropriates funds for payment of certain judgments rendered by the Board of Tax Appeals in certain claims against the state

LA HB404

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgments against the state in the consolidated actions entitled Canella et al. v Oliver et al. consolidated with Troy V. Canella v Oliver et al.

LA HB57

Appropriates funds for payment of certain consent judgments against the state through the Department of Transportation and Development

LA HB243

Appropriates funds for payment of certain consent judgments against the state through the Department of Transportation and Development

LA HB548

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled David L. Ocmand et al. v. Town of Brusly et al. c/w Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. the State of Louisiana c/w State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com. v. the State of Louisiana

LA HB552

Appropriates funds for payment of the amended non-appealable judgment by consent against the state in the suit entitled Mitchell Johnson, Jr. v. State of Louisiana et al. c/w David Lanus et al. v. State of Louisiana et al.

LA HB448

Appropriates funds for payment of the judgment against the state in the suit entitled Crooks v. State, Department of Natural Resources

LA HB367

Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled David L. Ocmand et al. v. Town of Brusly et al. c/w Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. the State of Louisiana c/w State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com. v. the State of Louisiana