Louisiana House Bill HB82

Louisiana 2010 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/10
• Refer: 3/29/10

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the state of Louisiana in the suit entitled "Janelle Ford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al"

Impact

The passing of this bill would ensure that the state government fulfills its financial obligations resulting from legal proceedings. This act of appropriation is significant as it reinforces the principle that state treasuries must cater to legal judgments, reflecting the state's accountability to its citizens and parties affected by its legal decisions. Furthermore, it showcases provisions for accountability in the state budget management, which is critical in upholding public trust.

Summary

House Bill 82 aims to appropriate funds out of the General Fund of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2010-2011 to cover a consent judgment from a court case involving Janelle Ford and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The specific amount in question is $2,250, which is designated for settling the legal obligations arising from the judgment. This initiative highlights the state's responsibility in addressing judicial outcomes and ensuring that judgments against the state are honored appropriately.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 82 appears to be neutral, stemming from the nature of the bill, which focuses on fulfilling a legal obligation rather than introducing new policy measures or changes to state law. Lawmakers generally agree on the need to adhere to court rulings; thus, there are no major ideological divides or contentious debates surrounding the bill, making it more of a procedural matter.

Contention

There may be minor points of contention regarding the funding allocation itself, as state funds are always a matter of careful consideration. However, given the nature of the bill, which strictly deals with the payment of a court-ordered judgment, significant contention or opposition is not anticipated. The only potential discussions could revolve around budgetary constraints and the prioritization of expenditures in light of limited resources.