Louisiana House Bill HB1116

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/14
• Refer: 4/1/14

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the matter of "Rena Ford Harrell, et al v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, et al" c/w "Rena Ford Harrell, et al v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, et al"

Impact

The passage of HB 1116 is significant as it directly impacts the financial management of the DOTD by mandating payment for a legally determined obligation. By appropriating these funds, the bill ensures that the state meets its judicial responsibilities without further delay, thus maintaining the state's creditworthiness and institutional integrity. It reflects a commitment to uphold the rule of law, fulfilling the state's financial obligations stemming from legal actions.

Summary

House Bill 1116, introduced by Representative Johnson, focuses on appropriating funds to satisfy a judgment against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). Specifically, the bill allocates $350,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2014-2015 to cover a consent judgment resulting from the lawsuit 'Rena Ford Harrell, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al'. This judgment arises from claims consolidated in the Ninth Judicial District Court in the parish of Rapides, related to issues exceeding typical administrative disputes within state-sponsored projects.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 1116 appears to be largely neutral but underscores a commitment to fiscal responsibility and compliance with legal judgments. Supporters may view the bill positively as a necessary step in maintaining trust in government accountability. There is likely consensus that honoring court decisions is vital for the credibility of state institutions, even though specific discussions revolve around budget implications and the sourcing of these funds.

Contention

While there are no overt points of contention noted in the discussions surrounding HB 1116, concerns may subtly arise regarding the appropriateness of allocating funds from the state general fund. Questions could be posed about how this appropriation might affect other budgetary needs within the DOTD or other state programs. Furthermore, the public perception of state financial management might influence discussions, especially if similar judgments arise in the future.