Louisiana House Bill HB135

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Appropriates funds for judgment against the Department of Transportation and Development in the matter of "Angela Cotton, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al"

Impact

The approval of HB135 would directly impact Louisiana's financial governance by ensuring that designated funds are used for settling legal judgments. It represents a commitment by the state to honor verdicts passed by its judicial system, which is crucial in maintaining public trust in state institutions. Furthermore, it indicates the state's acknowledgment of fiscal accountability and proper use of taxpayer money, which is crucial for its reputation and operational integrity.

Summary

House Bill 135 is a legislative proposal aimed at appropriating funds from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2012-2013. The bill specifically allocates a total sum of $361,677.93 for the payment of a court judgment resulting from the case 'Angela Cotton, et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al.' This act reflects the state's need to fulfill its financial obligations arising from legal judgments against it, thereby ensuring that the plaintiffs receive appropriate compensation as awarded by the court.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be neutral, as it primarily deals with the fulfillment of a financial obligation rather than introducing new laws or altering existing ones. However, there might be underlying concerns regarding budget allocation and the potential implications of repeated judgments against the state. Legislators and citizens alike may have varied opinions on how such financial decisions reflect the state's approach to litigation and accountability.

Contention

One notable point of contention might be the fiscal implications of repeatedly appropriating funds for legal judgments against the state. Critics could argue that there should be mechanisms for preventing such judgments from occurring, possibly by addressing systemic issues within state governance or departmental accountability, particularly concerning the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). While HB135 serves to smooth over a specific legal matter, it also invites broader discussions regarding legal risks and state liability.