Louisiana House Bill HB1039

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/19/14
• Refer: 3/20/14

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Harold Lafleur v. State of Louisiana DOTD"

Impact

The passage of HB1039 will directly impact state financial operations by allocating funds to settle a judgment against the state. This action emphasizes the importance of honoring legal commitments and maintaining the integrity of state financial management. The appropriation of funds in this instance may set a precedent for how similar financial obligations are handled in the future, influencing how the state responds to legal claims and judgments.

Summary

House Bill 1039 aims to appropriate funds from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2014-2015 specifically for the payment of a consent judgment in the case 'State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Harold Lafleur v. State of Louisiana, DOTD'. The total amount appropriated by this bill is $1,843.63, and it is intended to settle a legal matter that involves the Department of Transportation and Development in Louisiana. The passage of this bill is crucial to ensure that the state fulfills its financial obligations resulting from the court's decision.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB1039 appears to be neutral, as it primarily serves to address an obligation rather than introduce new legislation or policy changes. There may not be significant public debate or contention surrounding this bill, given its focused purpose of settling a legal financial obligation. However, it reflects the importance of responsible budgeting and fund allocation in state governance, which can resonate positively among fiscal responsibility advocates.

Contention

While the bill itself does not seem to have notable points of contention within the text or the recorded discussions, the underlying case signifies ongoing legal engagements that the state must navigate. It highlights the financial implications of litigation against state agencies, which can become a critical issue for policymakers when considering future budget proposals and legal liabilities. The lack of opposition in the current discussions suggests a consensus on the necessity of fulfilling judicial financial judgments.