Connecticut Senate Bill SJ00025

Connecticut 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/23
• Refer: 1/19/23

Caption

Resolution Amending The State Constitution To Require Certain Signatures On Emergency Certified Bills And Resolutions.

Impact

If enacted, SJ00025 would significantly alter the procedural landscape of state governance. It would increase the checks on emergency legislation, ensuring that such measures are not only the product of the majority party but also have the acknowledgment of minority leadership. Proponents argue that this will prevent hasty decisions made without adequate bipartisan support and encourage more deliberative consideration of emergency bills. This change could foster a more collaborative atmosphere in the legislature, leading to more balanced and representative decision-making, especially regarding critical state issues.

Summary

Senate Joint Resolution No. 25 (SJ00025) proposes an amendment to the Constitution of the state, aiming to require the signatures of key legislative leaders before any emergency certified bill or resolution can be filed. This move is driven by the need for greater oversight and accountability in the legislative process, particularly concerning the swift passage of laws that can substantially impact the state. By mandating the signatures of the president pro tempore of the Senate, the speaker of the House of Representatives, as well as the minority leaders of both chambers, the resolution seeks to ensure that there is a consensus among the key legislative figures before urgent measures are introduced into the lawmaking process.

Contention

Discussions surrounding SJ00025 could reveal points of contention based on how lawmakers perceive their ability to respond swiftly to emergencies. Supporters may contend that requiring additional signatures will ensure that all voices in the legislature are heard, reducing the risk of partisan overreach during critical times. Conversely, opponents might argue that adding such requirements could hinder the state's ability to react swiftly to urgent crises that demand immediate legislative action. This could spark debates about the balance between thorough legislative processes and the need for expediency in governance during emergencies.