Louisiana House Bill HB132

Louisiana 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/17/23
• Refer: 3/17/23
• Refer: 4/10/23
• Report Pass: 4/27/23
• Engrossed: 5/11/23
• Refer: 5/15/23
• Report Pass: 5/24/23
• Enrolled: 5/31/23
• Chaptered: 6/6/23
• Passed: 6/6/23

Caption

Provides relative to advertisement and sponsorship signs on property of the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by expanding the powers of the secretary of the Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism. This is significant as it streamlines processes related to advertising and sponsorship on public properties. Once the regulations are codified, the department can generate additional revenue while enhancing its visibility through strategic partnerships. Moreover, an annual report is mandated to monitor these agreements, ensuring transparency and accountability in how sponsorships are managed.

Summary

House Bill 132 focuses on the authority of the Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism to enter into sponsorship agreements and to allow advertising on department property. This legislation aims to authorize the placement and maintenance of advertisements and sponsorship signs across various assets of the department, including immovable property and vehicles. The bill introduces new rules and regulations that will govern the types of businesses eligible for sponsorship, as well as the specifications for the advertisements themselves.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 132 appears favorable, particularly among proponents who see it as a way to bolster state revenue through sponsorships. Supporters argue that this bill will provide necessary funding for the department, which oversees cultural and recreational initiatives across Louisiana. However, there could be concerns regarding the implications of commercializing public spaces, potentially leading to pushback from certain community groups or advocates who prioritize preserving the integrity of public property.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the specifics of the regulations that will be promulgated as a result of this bill. Critics might raise concerns regarding the criteria for sponsorship agreements, questioning which businesses might be allowed to advertise and how this could affect public perceptions of state properties. Furthermore, discussions about the balance between generating revenue and maintaining the aesthetic and cultural values of public spaces could surface, especially if local communities feel that external business interests are encroaching on state property.