California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2999

Introduced
2/21/20  
Refer
3/5/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/21/20  
Refer
5/21/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Report Pass
7/14/20  

Caption

Employees: bereavement leave.

Impact

The enactment of AB 2999 would significantly impact California's labor laws by formalizing bereavement leave as a right for employees, therefore enhancing existing protections concerning time off work for personal circumstances. By requiring employers to accommodate bereavement leave, the bill could foster a more compassionate workplace environment. However, it also places additional requirements on employers, particularly small businesses, which may lead to concerns about the financial implications of offering such leave without pay.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2999, also known as the Bereavement Leave Act of 2020, introduces provisions for bereavement leave for employees in California. The bill mandates that employers with 25 or more employees must provide up to 10 business days of unpaid bereavement leave following the death of close family members including spouses, children, parents, and domestic partners. For smaller employers with fewer than 25 employees, the bill requires a minimum of 3 business days of leave. This leave is designed to allow employees the necessary time to mourn and address matters following the death of a loved one without fear of losing their jobs.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 2999 appears to be supportive among advocates for employee rights and welfare. Proponents argue that offering bereavement leave is a necessary support for grieving employees and an essential aspect of humane labor practices. However, opposition may arise from business owners who express concern about the additional financial burdens placed upon them, particularly small businesses, as they navigate the balance between employee rights and operational viability.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding AB 2999 involves the potential financial strain placed on small employers who are required to comply with these leave provisions. Critics may argue that the bill does not consider the varying capabilities of small businesses to manage such mandates. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the definition of eligible family members and procedures for taking leave, which could create disputes about compliance and impact employee-employer relationships.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2624

Prisoners: employment: bereavement.

CA SB848

Employment: leave for reproductive loss.

CA AB2499

Employment: unlawful discrimination and paid sick days: victims of violence.

CA SB1105

Paid sick leave: agricultural employees: emergencies.

CA AB575

Paid family leave.

CA AB2011

Unlawful employment practices: small employer family leave mediation program: reproductive loss leave.

CA SB723

Employment: rehiring and retention: displaced workers.

CA SB497

Protected employee conduct.

CA AB1424

Occupational safety and health: cannabis delivery employee.

CA SB616

Sick days: paid sick days accrual and use.

Similar Bills

CA AB95

Employees: bereavement leave.

CA AB628

Employment: victims of sexual harassment: protections.

CA AB2366

Employment: victims of sexual harassment: protections.

CA AB3081

Employment: sexual harassment.

CA AB1578

Judiciary omnibus.

CA AB406

Employment: unlawful discrimination: victims of violence.

MN SF1018

Employer retaliation provisions modification; payroll deductions for contributions to nonprofit organizations authorization; pregnancy accommodations modification

MN HF1104

Employer retaliation provisions modified, and pregnancy accommodations modified.