Relating to the availability and use of airway clearance devices at public school campuses and to contracts for medication for respiratory distress and training at public schools.
Impact
This bill introduces significant changes to the Education Code by requiring school districts to have preparedness measures for respiratory emergencies. Alongside making airway clearance devices available, the bill allows school districts to contract for medications related to respiratory distress and training for school personnel and volunteers. This move acknowledges the importance of having trained staff who can properly administer necessary treatment, thus enhancing the overall medical readiness of schools for health issues related to respiratory conditions.
Summary
House Bill 549, known as the Westyn Bryan Mandrell Act, revolves around enhancing the availability and use of airway clearance devices at public school campuses in Texas. The bill mandates that each school district provides at least one airway clearance device on every campus, ensuring that such devices are accessible particularly where students typically consume food. This legislation is aimed at improving the safety and health of students by ensuring immediate access to essential medical equipment during emergencies involving respiratory distress.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 549 is largely positive, as many stakeholders, including educators and health advocates, recognize the necessity of equipping schools with the tools needed to address health emergencies effectively. The proactive approach of providing devices and training showcases a commitment to student well-being and safety. However, some concerns were raised about the funding and logistics of implementing these requirements across various school districts, particularly in areas with limited resources.
Contention
While the bill is designed to improve student health safety, contention exists around ensuring that all school districts can financially support the provision of airway clearance devices and training. Critics have voiced concerns about the feasibility of meeting these mandates, especially for economically disadvantaged districts. Additionally, there are discussions regarding the potential liabilities schools may face while implementing these measures and whether adequate funding will be allocated to support comprehensive training programs.
Relating to the use of epinephrine auto-injectors and medication designated for treatment of respiratory distress on public and private school campuses.
Relating to the use of opioid antagonists on the campuses of public and private schools and institutions of higher education and at or in transit to or from off-campus school events.
Relating to measures to prevent and respond to opioid-related drug overdoses, including policies and training regarding the use of opioid antagonists, at student residences on campuses of public institutions of higher education; providing immunity.
Relating to the maintenance, administration, and disposal of opioid antagonists on public and private school campuses and to the permissible uses of money appropriated to a state agency from the opioid abatement account.
Relating to measures for ensuring safety and security in public schools, including measures related to the health and safety of public school students and active shooter training for certain peace officers.