Relating to civil liability of a business in connection with prohibiting concealed handguns on the business premises.
This legislation modifies existing statutes within Chapter 95A of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by specifically addressing the implications of prohibiting concealed handguns. It sets a precedent that businesses must weigh the potential risks associated with disallowing concealed firearms on their properties, particularly regarding liability in case of criminal incidents. The bill aims to balance business rights with public safety, potentially affecting how businesses approach security measures on their premises.
SB82 is a legislative measure aimed at establishing civil liability for businesses that prohibit concealed handguns on their premises. According to the bill, if a business owner posts a sign prohibiting entry to licensed handgun holders, they may be held liable for damages resulting from criminal acts that occur on their property. This includes instances where crimes are committed against patrons of the business, which could lead to significant financial repercussions for the business owner if they have opted to restrict firearm access.
SB82 has sparked discussions regarding the extent of liability that business owners should bear, particularly in an environment where gun rights remain a contentious issue. Supporters of the bill argue that it protects businesses from being held accountable for crimes on their property when they have taken precautions to prohibit firearms. Conversely, critics express concern that the bill may discourage businesses from exercising their rights to set their own policies regarding firearm possession, potentially making customers feel unsafe in environments where firearms are allowed. The debate highlights the ongoing struggle between individual rights and business interests in the context of gun legislation.
Civil Practice And Remedies Code
Government Code
Penal Code