Relating to a requirement that certain rules proposed by state agencies in the executive branch of state government be approved by certain elected state officials.
Impact
If enacted, HB 587 would create a more stringent review process for regulations proposed by state agencies, emphasizing accountability and transparency within the state's executive bureaucracy. This could potentially slow down the rule-making process as agencies would need to secure approvals before moving forward, which some observers argue may hinder timely responses to emergencies or urgent policy needs. Conversely, proponents advocate that such an oversight mechanism is essential for democratic governance and for preventing overreach by unelected officials.
Summary
House Bill 587 proposes a requirement for certain rules suggested by state agencies within the executive branch of Texas to receive approval from elected officials before they can be enacted. Specifically, the bill amends the Government Code to mandate that any proposed rule must be accompanied by a certification indicating it has been reviewed and endorsed by the governor or an elected state officer of the agency in question. This requirement is aimed at enhancing oversight and ensuring that elected officials have a say in the regulatory process, particularly for rules that could significantly impact the public or stakeholders.
Conclusion
Overall, HB 587 aims to reinforce the role of elected officials in bureaucratic governance in Texas and modifies existing protocols around rule-making by state agencies. The anticipated effects on public policy, regulatory efficiency, and government oversight are likely to be focal points for discussion among lawmakers and advocacy groups as the bill progresses through the legislative process.
Contention
There may be contention regarding the balance of power between elected officials and state agencies. Critics of the bill could argue that requiring approval from higher elected officials might lead to politicization of the rule-making process, potentially obstructing necessary regulations that are in the public interest. Additionally, the bill's implications on emergency rules, which would also require gubernatorial oversight within ten days of their adoption, may spark debate on the effectiveness of the state's ability to react promptly during crises.
Duplicate
Relating to a requirement that certain rules proposed by state agencies in the executive branch of state government be approved by certain elected state officials.
Relating to a requirement that certain rules proposed by state agencies in the executive branch of state government be approved by certain elected state officials.
Relating to the disclosure of certain gifts, grants, contracts, and financial interests received from a foreign source by certain state agencies, public institutions of higher education, and state contractors, and to the approval and monitoring of employment-related foreign travel and activities by certain public institution of higher education employees; providing civil and administrative penalties.
Relating to the disclosure of certain gifts, grants, contracts, and financial interests received from a foreign source by certain state agencies, public institutions of higher education, and state contractors, and to the approval and monitoring of employment-related foreign travel and activities by certain public institution of higher education employees; providing civil and administrative penalties.