Alabama Senate Bill SB23

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/23
• Refer: 2/27/23
• Report Pass: 3/21/23
• Engrossed: 4/6/23
• Refer: 4/6/23
• Report Pass: 4/19/23
• Enrolled: 4/26/23
• Passed: 4/26/23

Caption

To amend Section 12-17-81 of the Code of Alabama 1975, to further provide for the salary of all circuit clerks in the Unified Judicial System based on the pay plan adopted by the personnel system of the Unified Judicial System.

Impact

The introduction of SB23 will create a standardized pay system for circuit clerks, offering predictability in compensation and incentivizing experience within the Unified Judicial System. By linking salaries directly to the established pay plan, the bill aims to eliminate discrepancies that may arise due to individual contracts or local variances in compensation, promoting equity across the judicial clerk positions. This systematic approach may also contribute to maintaining consistency in budget allocations by the state for judicial salaries.

Summary

SB23 aims to amend Section 12-17-81 of the Code of Alabama 1975, establishing a structured salary framework for all circuit clerks within the Unified Judicial System. The bill stipulates that the annual salary for incoming circuit clerks will be set at step one on the designated pay plan upon their appointment or election. Moreover, current clerks are assured annual salary increases based on their years of service until the maximum authorized step is reached, thereby ensuring a growth trajectory in their compensation aligned with an established pay scale.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SB23 has been largely favorable among legislators, with an overwhelming majority voting in support. The bill's structured approach to salary increases reflects a commitment to the professionalism and compensation of those serving in the judiciary, which may be welcomed by those advocating for judicial staff rights. This shows a recognition of the importance of fair wages in the effective functioning of the judicial system.

Contention

While the sentiment has been positive, some contention may arise regarding the limitations placed on local supplements to salaries. SB23 specifies that local systems cannot decrease state salaries or adjust local provisions established prior to the enactment of this bill. As such, municipalities that previously had the discretion to enrich these compensation packages may face challenges in maintaining competitive salaries, potentially leading to disparities within different jurisdictions as the cost of living factors come into play.