Alabama House Bill HB323

Alabama 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/13/23
• Refer: 4/13/23
• Report Pass: 5/3/23
• Engrossed: 5/18/23
• Refer: 5/18/23
• Report Pass: 5/31/23

Caption

Relating to first responders; to require certain benefits be made available to first responders suffering from work-related post-traumatic stress disorder; to make certain leave benefits available to employed first responders; and to have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022.

Impact

By implementing these provisions, HB 323 seeks to improve the overall well-being and support for first responders, whose mental health is often at risk due to the traumatic nature of their work. The legislation reflects a growing recognition of the mental health challenges faced by this group and aims to ensure they receive necessary support consistent with modern understandings of occupational health. The bill also requires that local governments contribute to the fund, which may be viewed as a significant shift in responsibility for local entities, potentially increasing their financial obligations.

Summary

House Bill 323 addresses the needs of first responders suffering from work-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by mandating specific benefits. This bill aims to support first responders, including both career and volunteer firefighters and law enforcement officers, by providing financial assistance for treatment-related expenses and guaranteeing time off work for treatment. A fund will be established to manage these benefits, regulated by the Alabama League of Municipalities and the Department of Labor. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that any benefits received will be exempt from state income tax, alleviating financial burdens for affected individuals.

Contention

While the bill has garnered broad support—passing with a vote of 99-3—it also highlights potential points of contention surrounding the financial impact on local governments. Since the bill mandates an expenditure of local funds, its enactment requires approval by a two-thirds vote among local entities, raising questions about budgetary constraints and priorities. Additionally, the necessity of establishing the fund to facilitate the benefits may be a concern for some municipalities, particularly smaller ones that might struggle with the financial implications.