Arkansas Senate Bill SB189

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Report Pass: 2/8/23
• Engrossed: 2/13/23
• Refer: 2/13/23
• Report Pass: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/27/23
• Report Pass: 3/1/23
• Enrolled: 3/2/23
• Chaptered: 3/14/23
• Passed: 3/14/23

Caption

To Clarify The Definition Of "intellectual And Developmental Disability" In The Arkansas Code.

Impact

The impact of SB 189 on state laws includes a refinement of the legal definitions that govern the allocation of support services. By specifying the characteristics and conditions associated with intellectual and developmental disabilities, the bill aims to enhance accessibility to resources tailored to individuals' needs. This amendment may facilitate better funding and programs for affected persons, ultimately promoting equity in the allocation of education, Medicaid services, and other community resources available to individuals with disabilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 189 seeks to clarify the definition of 'intellectual and developmental disability' in the Arkansas Code. The bill provides detailed criteria for what constitutes such disabilities, encompassing specific conditions like cerebral palsy, spina bifida, Down syndrome, epilepsy, and autism. The intent of this bill is to ensure that the definition aligns with contemporary medical understanding and effectively encompasses various disabilities that require additional support. This clarity is essential for structuring appropriate services and resources for individuals who meet the defined criteria.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 189 appears to be generally positive among legislators, reflecting a collective agreement on improving service delivery for individuals with disabilities. The bill received unanimous support during its third reading, indicating widespread acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the legal definitions that guide support protocols. However, discussions may have included points of contention regarding the precise definitions and how they link to funding and service eligibility, which typically arise in matters that seek to define and categorize disabilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the nuances of defining 'intellectual and developmental disabilities' and the implications for individuals who could potentially fall outside of these classifications. Specific concerns have been raised regarding the inclusivity of certain conditions and the potential barriers this might create for individuals seeking support. The challenge remains to balance precise definitions with comprehensive inclusion to ensure no individual is inadvertently excluded from necessary resources and services.