Arkansas House Bill HB1377

Arkansas 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 2/21/23
• Engrossed: 2/22/23
• Enrolled: 2/23/23
• Chaptered: 2/27/23
• Passed: 2/27/23

Caption

An Act For The Department Of Parks, Heritage, And Tourism - State Parks And Tourism Divisions Reappropriation.

Impact

This legislation has the potential to significantly impact state laws regarding funding and resource allocation for recreational and heritage sites. By allowing the reallocation of funds, HB1377 ensures continued investment in public amenities and cultural preservation within Arkansas, fostering an environment that can attract tourism and promote the state’s natural beauty. The act’s emergency clause suggests a necessary urgency for the appropriations to take effect by July 1, 2023, indicating that timely funding is critical to avoid disruptions in park operations and services.

Summary

House Bill 1377 is an act aimed at reappropriating funds for the Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism, particularly focusing on the State Parks and Tourism Divisions. The act specifies the reallocation of existing appropriations to enhance state park services, maintain and renovate facilities, and boost tourism efforts across Arkansas. Notably, it cites an allocation of $11,975,000 for the preservation of state-owned lands and historic sites, alongside funds designated for the maintenance of War Memorial Stadium and related infrastructure improvements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1377 appears to be largely positive among those who prioritize outdoor recreation and tourism development as vital components of Arkansas’s economy. Legislative discussions have demonstrated a sense of urgency to preserve and enhance the state’s resources, thus garnering broad support among lawmakers. Moreover, the fact that the bill passed with unanimous consent (yeas: 35, nays: 0) reflects consensus on the importance of maintaining the state's parks and tourism infrastructure.

Contention

While HB1377 has received support from a majority of legislators, some concerns may relate to the specifics of fund allocation and the long-term vision for state parks and tourism. There may be discussions on how these funds are utilized and whether they sufficiently address the diverse needs of various parks and historical sites throughout the state. Additionally, the reliance on existing budgetary lines may limit the ability to pursue new initiatives or improvements outside the scope of current appropriations.