Hawaii 2022 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB371

Introduced
1/25/21  

Caption

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

Impact

If enacted, HB371 would amend Section 481A-3 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to include provisions that penalize sellers for discriminatory shipping practices. This change reflects a commitment to consumer protection in Hawaii and aligns shipping policies with those of other states, ensuring residents are not disadvantaged. The measure also broadens the scope of consumer claims under existing laws, allowing for greater accountability of sellers who engage in unfair shipping practices.

Summary

House Bill 371 is designed to address deceptive trade practices, particularly concerning shipping policies that unfairly discriminate against consumers based in Hawaii. The bill explicitly states that any seller of goods who offers free or reduced shipping to customers in other states but refuses to honor that offer for shipments to Hawaii is engaging in unfair and deceptive practices. This clarification is significant as it aims to protect local consumers from being unfairly treated by companies that market their shipping promotions to out-of-state residents while excluding Hawaii customers.

Contention

While the bill's intent is to protect Hawaii consumers, it may face contention regarding its implications for online retailers. Critics may argue that imposing restrictions on shipping practices could complicate logistics for businesses operating nationwide, particularly those that rely heavily on automated shipping systems. Proponents, on the other hand, stress the importance of equitable treatment in commerce and the need to safeguard consumer rights, suggesting that the bill is a necessary step to promote fair business practices.

Final_notes

Overall, HB371 reflects Hawaii's proactive approach to consumer protection in the evolving landscape of e-commerce. By clarifying the legal ramifications of discriminatory shipping offers, the bill seeks to establish fairer practices for all residents. It underscores the legislative body's role in advocating for consumers while balancing the needs of businesses operating in a digital and increasingly interconnected marketplace.

Companion Bills

HI SB562

Same As Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

Previously Filed As

HI HB2035

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB2329

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB562

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI HB643

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB158

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI HB643

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB158

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

HI SB2020

Relating To Deceptive Trade Practices.

Similar Bills

CA SB921

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB868

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB794

Cannabis: advertising and marketing restrictions.

CA AB2716

Cannabis: advertisements: highways.

CA AB1175

Outdoor advertising displays: redevelopment agency project areas.

CA AB2546

Commercial email advertisements.

CA SB405

Outdoor advertising displays: exemptions: City of Artesia.

CA AB1982

Outdoor advertising displays: exemptions: City of Artesia.