California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB868

Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Report Pass
3/30/23  
Refer
4/3/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/27/23  
Report Pass
6/27/23  
Refer
6/27/23  
Refer
6/27/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Report Pass
8/14/23  
Report Pass
8/14/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Refer
8/21/23  

Caption

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

Impact

If enacted, AB 868 will create a centralized, publicly accessible online repository of digital political advertisements. This repository is intended to improve transparency regarding who is funding and responsible for various campaign ads. By requiring detailed disclosures from committees that spend over $1,000 on digital advertisements, the bill seeks to empower voters and watchdog organizations with easier access to information about campaign financing. The commission will also be tasked with maintaining these records for at least 12 years, ensuring long-term accountability.

Summary

Assembly Bill 868, known as the Digital Advertisement Transparency and Accountability Act, proposes amendments to the Political Reform Act of 1974, focusing on the increasingly important role of digital advertising in political campaigns. The legislation aims to address the challenges posed by digital media in tracking and regulating campaign advertisements. In particular, the bill mandates that committees purchasing digital ads submit detailed information about these ads to the Fair Political Practices Commission, which includes information about the committee, the advertisement content, and payment details to the advertising platform. This initiative responds to concerns about transparency and accountability in digital advertising, where misinformation can flourish without proper oversight.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 868 appears to be largely positive among proponents, who advocate for increased transparency in political advertising and greater public awareness of campaign financing. However, some critics have raised concerns about the feasibility of compliance and the potential for bureaucratic overreach by requiring extensive reporting from committees. The balance between facilitating transparency and not overburdening legitimate campaign activities remains a point of contention among stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications for local agencies, as the bill specifies that no reimbursement is required for local agencies or school districts for costs incurred due to the new reporting requirements, which could be interpreted as passing down costs of compliance. Additionally, the emphasis on digital ad transparency highlights the ongoing national conversation about misinformation in the political arena, suggesting that while the bill may advance transparency, it also could lead to further regulatory scrutiny regarding digital campaigns.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB921

Political Reform Act of 1974: digital political advertisements.

CA AB1798

Campaign disclosure: advertisements.

CA AB2885

False campaign speech and online platform disclosures.

CA AB1379

Online platforms: disclosures.

CA AB2188

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures: advertisements.

CA AB864

Political Reform Act of 1974: disclosures.

CA AB1217

Political Reform Act of 1974: electioneering and issue lobbying communications: disclosures.