Relating To Historic Preservation Reviews.
The proposed amendments to section 6E-8 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes will enable the DHHL to manage the review process for projects more effectively, provided that they comply with administrative rules and designate a qualified preservation officer for oversight. This change is anticipated to enhance local control over historic preservation reviews, reflecting an attitude that acknowledges the unique status of Native Hawaiian lands and the cultural significance of historic sites associated with them.
Senate Bill 3103 seeks to amend existing provisions related to historic preservation in Hawaii, specifically empowering the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) to take over the review of proposed projects affecting historic properties or burial sites on lands under its jurisdiction. The bill is rooted in recognizing the importance of handling such matters sensitive to cultural heritage and aims to streamline the review process, ensuring that projects align with the preservation of Hawaii's historical sites and practices.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 3103 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents who emphasize the importance of preserving Hawaii's historic and cultural sites through localized governance. The support for the bill suggests a recognition of the challenges faced by communities in managing these reviews effectively, as well as a commitment to honoring the state's heritage. However, there may be some nuances and concerns about how the bill could be implemented adequately, especially regarding potential conflicts with existing rules governing preservation.
Despite the general support for the intentions of SB 3103, there is a potential contention regarding the degree to which local departments, specifically the DHHL, are ready to assume such responsibilities. Questions remain about the adequacy of resources and professional expertise required to effectively handle these reviews without compromising the thoroughness necessary for historic preservation. Another point of contention could arise from balancing the interests of development against the need for preservation, with stakeholders advocating for proper safeguards to ensure that historical properties are not neglected in the pursuit of new projects.