Hawaii House Bill HB569

Hawaii 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/27/23

Caption

Relating To Historic Preservation Reviews.

Impact

The passage of HB569 will significantly alter the existing framework for historic preservation reviews in Hawaii. Currently, the DHHL is required to consult the Department of Land and Natural Resources before initiating projects affecting historic properties. With this amendment, the DHHL can independently assume this review function, thus expediting decision-making processes for projects on Hawaiian Home Lands. This change aligns with the state's goals of enhancing local governance and recognition of indigenous rights, and it supports the idea of localized decision-making on matters significant to the cultural heritage of Native Hawaiians.

Summary

House Bill 569 facilitates the role of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) in the field of historic preservation. It amends section 6E-8 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, allowing the DHHL to conduct reviews on proposed projects that affect historic properties or burial sites on the lands under its jurisdiction. This legislative change aims to streamline the process and empower the DHHL to take a more active role in managing and protecting these significant sites within Hawaiian homelands. By assigning the review to a qualified Hawaiian home lands preservation officer, the bill ensures that the management of historic properties is handled by professionals with relevant expertise in historical preservation.

Contention

While there may be broad support for the intent behind HB569, potential points of contention revolve around the balance of authority between state departments. Although the DHHL will gain more autonomy in conducting reviews, critics may raise concerns about oversight and the preservation of critical cultural sites. There could be debates regarding the adequacy of the DHHL’s resources and expertise relative to the Department of Land and Natural Resources, raising questions about whether this shift could lead to inadequate protection for historic properties or burial sites. Stakeholders may also express concerns about the effectiveness of the review process in light of these changes.